Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Ad Code

Responsive Advertisement

Google faces $425 million verdict over privacy breach

Google Faces $425 Million Verdict Over Privacy Breach

Breaking News: A federal jury in San Francisco has ordered Google to pay $425 million in damages for continuing to collect user data even when privacy settings were disabled.

Case Overview

On September 4, 2025, Alphabet's Google received a significant legal blow when a federal jury determined the tech giant must pay $425 million for privacy violations. The case centered on allegations that Google continued collecting data from millions of users who had explicitly turned off tracking features in their Google accounts over an eight-year period.

The class action lawsuit, originally filed in July 2020, accused Google of accessing users' mobile devices to collect, save, and use their data despite privacy assurances under its "Web & App Activity" setting. The violation affected approximately 98 million Google users across 174 million devices.

Google faces $425 million verdict over privacy breach
Google faces $425 million verdict over privacy breach

Key Case Details

Case AspectDetails
Court LocationFederal Court in San Francisco
Verdict Amount$425 Million
Original Damages SoughtOver $31 Billion
Affected Users98 Million Google Users
Affected Devices174 Million Devices
Time Period8 Years of Data Collection
Filing DateJuly 2020

Legal Findings

The jury found Google liable on two of three privacy violation claims brought by the plaintiffs. Notably, the jury determined that Google had not acted with malice, which prevented the plaintiffs from receiving punitive damages. This distinction was crucial in limiting the financial penalty to $425 million rather than a potentially larger punitive award.

Google's Recent Privacy Settlement Costs

$425M
Sep 2025
Privacy Breach
$1.4B
2024
Texas Settlement
Billions
Apr 2024
Incognito Data

How the Data Collection Worked

According to the lawsuit, Google continued collecting user data through its relationships with popular apps including Uber, Venmo, and Meta's Instagram. These apps utilized certain Google analytics services, creating a backdoor for data collection even when users had disabled the "Web & App Activity" setting.

Google defended its practices by stating that the collected data was "nonpersonal, pseudonymous, and stored in segregated, secured, and encrypted locations." The company argued that this data was not associated with users' Google accounts or any individual user's identity.

98M
Users Affected
174M
Devices Impacted
8
Years of Collection

Timeline of Events

2012-2020: Google allegedly continues data collection despite users disabling Web & App Activity settings
July 2020: Class action lawsuit filed against Google in San Francisco federal court
April 2024: Google settles separate Incognito mode privacy lawsuit, agreeing to destroy billions of data records
2024: Google pays $1.4 billion to Texas over separate privacy law violations
September 4, 2025: Federal jury orders Google to pay $425 million in damages

Company Response and Future Implications

Google has announced its intention to appeal the verdict. Company spokesperson Jose Castaneda stated, "This decision misunderstands how our products work. Our privacy tools give people control over their data, and when they turn off personalization, we honor that choice."

Meanwhile, David Boies, representing the plaintiffs, expressed satisfaction with the verdict, indicating that users were "obviously very pleased with the verdict the jury returned."

This verdict represents part of a broader pattern of privacy-related legal challenges facing Google. The company has faced increasing scrutiny over its data collection practices, resulting in multiple settlements and legal actions across different jurisdictions.

Broader Privacy Landscape

The $425 million verdict occurs within a context of heightened privacy enforcement. Technology companies are facing increased regulatory pressure and legal action regarding data collection practices. This case demonstrates the potential financial consequences when user trust is compromised, even when companies argue their practices involve anonymized or pseudonymous data.

For users, this case highlights the importance of understanding how their data is collected and used, even when privacy settings suggest otherwise. It also underscores the ongoing legal evolution surrounding digital privacy rights in an increasingly connected world.

Post a Comment

1 Comments

  1. Our privacy tools give people control over their data, and when they turn off personalization, we honor that choice

    ReplyDelete